Rolf's course 31/01

• object
• perversion
• subject

things function not due to use but because they can (ability of can)

we interpreted the use in different ways. we talk for different uses but we understand the use of the others through communication

references:

Bernard Tschumi: event-cities / event-cities 2 / event-cities 3; concept vs. context vs. content

Peter Fischli, David Weiss: Der Lauf Der Dinge
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K73ux73wddk
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0094300/

Per Olaf 26/01: To compare the notes with you

- function is not an object, but a programme for a particular activity
- function has a content but it has not a 3D expression
- the expression of is free because it's not still expressed. This expression doesn't necessary repeat or copy the function, but it finds an indentity itself
- the "function" it comes from something but emerges something elsewhich is embedded in the first something.

references:

painting: Tower of Babel - Tobias Vercaecht

















poetry: Seamus Heaney http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seamus_Heaney
Richard Willhem http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Wilhelm